CNN wants us to believe Kamala Harris pulled in a jaw-dropping $81 million in just 24 hours. Impressive, right? But let’s wade into the murky depths of how the Democrats allegedly make this magic happen.
Enter James O’Keefe, the undercover sleuth exposing ActBlue’s alleged money laundering schemes. At a secretive conference in Boston, O’Keefe got the dirt from an insider. When O’Keefe flashed his press pass, security hustled him out so fast his head spun, and things got so heated the cops had to get involved.
The Unsettling Discovery by Apple Lamps on X (formerly Twitter)
An investigation by @lamps_apple on X has revealed some fishy patterns in ActBlue’s donation data, hinting at manipulation to fake grassroots support. Here’s the lowdown:
In just 10 minutes on FEC.GOV, check out what was uncovered about four individuals, all supposedly unemployed and living in modest homes:
2023-2024 Election Cycle:
- Amy, OR: $42,256.15 over 7,975 donations
- Sandra, CA: $30,051.30 over 6,797 donations
- Carolyn, NJ: $53,345.67 over 5,998 donations
- Thomas, WI: $69,340.56 over 2,656 donations
These seemingly average citizens have collectively donated nearly $200,000 through 23,416 separate donations. This equates to an average of 10 donations per day, every day, since January 1, 2023.
The Four-Day Donation Frenzy
Between May 1st, 2024, and May 4th, 2024, 1,689 people made over 15 separate donations each to ActBlue. This bizarre pattern screams for answers about the honesty and transparency of these fundraising practices. Seriously, who donates 15 times in just four days?
The Need for Scrutiny
This peculiar activity screams of a deliberate attempt to deceive the public and inflate the perception of grassroots support. While we can’t definitively claim fraud just yet, the suspicious nature of these donations demands a thorough investigation. Who’s going to dig into this mess and get us some answers?
What is Being Done?
The public deserves to know the truth behind these questionable fundraising tactics. The mainstream media has remained silent, but the evidence demands scrutiny. Are these donations a genuine show of support, or is there a more sinister agenda at play?
Transparency and honesty in political fundraising are essential for maintaining public trust. It is crucial that these patterns are investigated rigorously to ensure the integrity of our political processes.
Final Thoughts
The Democrats’ fundraising methods through ActBlue need to be examined with a critical eye. The alarming data suggests a deliberate attempt to manipulate public perception. The need for transparency has never been more urgent. As these revelations unfold, it is clear that the public deserves honest answers about the true nature of ActBlue’s fundraising practices.
Disclaimer: No fraud or wrongdoing has been proven. This report is based on suspicious activity that warrants further investigation and honest feedback.